Should speed depend on customer need? Would making speed/privacy (T2) and storage flexible (BTO?) for those that choose it be better? Reliability (given the keyboard-gate) and sustainability arguments would seem moot in context. "Everything about this device says, “HP cares.” This manufacturer wants you to upgrade and maintain this device as long as physically possible.” IIf there is some overarching benefit to customers in all of this it would be helpful to know. "No one who has followed this Apple support document instructing them to shake their laptop at a 75 degree angle and spray their keyboard with air in a precise zig-zag pattern will quibble over a slightly thicker design.” /en-us/ht205662 "There is a real business impact caused by unrepairable product design.”Īpple Engineers Its Own Downfall With the Macbook Pro Keyboard - iFixit
"As we’ve progressed toward thinner, lighter, more integrated Macs, we’ve paid dearly in upgradeability, versatility, and value.” Just look at the market demand for the six-year-old 2012 MacBook Pro-the last fully upgradeable notebook Apple made. "there is a loud outcry for reliable, long-lasting, upgradeable machines. Is Apple design increasingly unacceptable?
0 kommentar(er)
